Judge Belvin Perry says issue of whether Casey Anthony must return to serve a year of probation on her check fraud case is “a mess”

“If anything could go wrong, it went wrong here.”  That is what Judge Belvin Perry said after hearing over an hour of arguments from both prosecution and defense attorneys.  Judge Perry ended the hearing without a ruling.  The Judge said he needed more time to decide whether or not Casey Anthony must return to serve 1 year of probation on her check fraud case.  He did not say when he expected to have a ruling.

At the hearing, defense attorneys argued that Anthony had already served her term of probation while she was incarcerated.  Therefore, if she were required to serve probation now, it would constitute double jeopardy.  The defense further argued that any amendment to Anthony’s sentence must have been done within 60 days of her original sentence back in January of 2010 and that the court now lacked jurisdiction to go back and change or modify the order.

Department of Corrections officials explained that they believed the sentence required Anthony to serve the probation while she was in jail awaiting her murder trial and that she had, in fact, completed her probation.

The prosecution argued that the failure by the Trial Judge to put the words, “upon release” was a scrivener‘s error and therefore could be amended by the Judge without causing double jeopardy.

Judge Perry called the case, “a legal morass” and “a mess.”  To be continued…

Miami-Dade “Back on Track Program” for first time DUI Offenders

What is the new “Back on Track Program” offered by the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office?

The “Back on Track Program” is a program supervised by Court Options that allows some first time offenders to have their DUI charged reduced to a Withhold of Adjudication for Reckless Driving.  It is being offered by the Office of the State Attorney because too many drunk drivers who challenged their cases in court were slipping though the system and receiving no punishment.  A recent article in the Miami Herald introducing the program may be found here.

Miami-Dade “Back on Track Program” criteria for acceptance:

  • Defendant must not have alcohol-related driving history where disposition is either withhold of adjudication or a conviction.
  • Defendant may have up to one-prior, non-violent felony conviction, and up to two prior misdemeanor convictions.
  • Defendant may have completed no more than one misdemeanor diversion program and no more than one felony diversion program.
  • The defendant must not have been at fault on an accident, if one was involved as part of the incident.
  • There must not have been minor children in the vehicle at the time of the arrest.
  • Defendants who were arrested for DUI during the period of a suspended license will be denied admission into the program. If the suspension period has expired and the defendant is eligible to obtain a license but has not done so at the time of the DUI arrest, the defendant will still be eligible to participate.

If you qualify for acceptance in the Back on Track Program then you will be classified as either a Tier 1 or Tier 2 offender:

  • Tier 1 = Blood Alcohol Level below .15
  • Tier 2 = Blood Alcohol Level at .15 and above or Refusal

The conditions associated with each Tier are as follows:

Tier 1

  • 6 – 9 months in the program
  • 10 day vehicle impound ($100)
  • Monetary donation ($300)
  • DUI School and Substance Abuse Evaluation ($252)
  • Treatment if required after substance abuse evaluation ($300-$500)
  • Cost of Prosecution ($50)
  • Cost of Supervision ($500)
  • Cost of Recovery to Law Enforcement (varies depending on agency)
  • Community Service (40 hours)
  • Victim Impact Class – 2 hours ($40)

Tier 2

  • 12 months in the program
  • 6 month vehicle ignition interlock ($305)
  • Monetary donation ($500)
  • DUI School and Substance Abuse Evaluation ($387)
  • Treatment if required after substance abuse evaluation ($300-$500)
  • Cost of Prosecution ($50)
  • Cost of Supervision ($650)
  • Cost of Recovery to Law Enforcement (varies depending on agency)
  • Community Service (60 hours)
  • Victim Impact Class – 2 hours ($40)

My thoughts regarding the “Back on Track Program.”

The program is an excellent option for many first time offenders who qualify for it.  For persons who complete the program they will have their DUI charge amended to a Reckless Driving charge with a Withhold of Adjudication.  This will allow them to seal their record later unless they have previously had another misdemeanor or felony case where they were adjudicated guilty.  It will also not be considered as a conviction and therefore should not affect their insurance premiums.

With that said, it is always best to retain a qualified attorney to review your case before you enter into a program like this.  When a person enters into the “Back on Track Program” they are required to sign an admission of guilt.  If they later drop out or fail to meet the conditions of the program, then their admission of guilt may be used against them.  There is no turning back once you sign up and enter the program.  By entering the program a person gives up any chance they have to challenge their DUI arrest.  They will not be able to dispute any of the evidence against them or file any motions to suppress evidence.  Additionally, a review of the penalties shows that the requirements to complete the program are quite extensive.  To complete the program, a person must attend DUI school and treatment if required, impound their vehicle or place an ignition interlock device that they must blow into in order to start their vehicle, perform community service hours and attend a victim impact class.

Another reason that I believe that the hiring of an attorney is important is because entering the Back on Track Program does not in any way affect the Administrative Suspension associated with a first time DUI.  When a person blows over .08%, on a first DUI, this triggers an automatic 180 day license suspension and the person must serve 30 days of that suspension before being eligible for a hardship license.  If a person refuses to blow on a first DUI they will receive a license suspension of 1 year and the person must serve 90 days of that suspension before being eligible for a hardship license.  The DUI administrative suspensions must be challenged within 10 days of the DUI arrest or they will be permanently waived.

A PDF file from Court Options that details the Back on Track Program’s criteria and requirements may be seen here: Miami-Dade Court Options – DUI Back on Track Program.

***Note:  The Back on Track Program is only available in Miami-Dade County.  It is not an option in any other Florida counties such as Broward, Palm Beach, Monroe, etc.

Stay issued on order requiring Casey Anthony to report to probation

The order issued on Monday by Judge Stan Strickland requiring Casey Anthony to report in person to probation in Orlando by Thursday has been stayed by Judge Belvin Perry.  Judge Strickland’s order reassigned the matter to Judge Perry so he will be the one who ultimately decides Anthony’s probationary fate.  The Judge has scheduled a hearing on Friday morning at 9am to address the issue.

Casey Anthony ordered to serve probation in check fraud case

Orlando Circuit Court Judge Stan Strickland has signed an amended court document ordering Casey Anthony to serve one year of supervised probation on her check fraud case number 2008-CF-013331-A-O.  Under the order, Casey Anthony must report to Orange County within 72 hours.

On January 25, 2010, Anthony was sentenced on 13 counts of fraud while she was in jail pending her trial for the murder of her daughter, Caylee Anthony.  At that time, the sentence was 412 days in jail with credit for time served of 412 days, 1 year probation and court costs.  The original document sentencing Anthony back in Jan did not have the important words, “upon release” after the imposed requirement of 1 year of probation.

The new order by Judge Strickland, imposes 1 year of probation, $20 per month in cost of supervision and $348 in court costs.  Additionally, Anthony may not leave Orange County Florida without the permission of her probation officer.

The order can be seen here: Casey Anthony – Order

Sealing or Expunging of Criminal Records in Florida

Can you seal or expunge your criminal record?

In order to Seal or Expunge your criminal record it must be determined that you are eligible to do so.  The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) is the governing body who determines whether or not a person is eligible to Seal or Expunge their criminal record.  The following statutes may be referred to in order to determine eligibility:

Expunging a criminal record – Florida Statute §943.0585

Sealing a criminal record – Florida Statute §943.059

If you have ever been adjudicated guilty (or adjudged delinquent as a juvenile) of any misdemeanor or felony crime, then you will not be eligible to seal or expunge your criminal record.  This includes a conviction for DUI, Reckless Driving or Driving while license suspended (DWLS).

In order to Seal or Expunge your criminal record, the case that you seek to seal or expunge must be closed.  This would include the completion of all court supervision including any probationary terms.

What is the Difference between Sealing and Expunging my criminal record?

A criminal record that is sealed will be kept on file at both the courthouse and the arresting police agency.  The record will be placed in a sealed envelope and will not be viewable by the public unless an order to unseal the record is obtained from the court.  FDLE will also keep a record of the arrest.  The record will also be cleared from the court’s computer database by the clerk of the court.

A criminal record that is expunged will be destroyed by both the Clerk of the Court and that arresting police agency.  It will also be erased from the court’s online computer database.  The only agency that will retain a record of the arrest will be FDLE.

How many criminal records can I Seal or Expunge?

You may only Seal or Expunge one criminal record once in your lifetime.  If you have two prior records that arose out of separate arrests (that could both be eligible for sealing or expunging), you would have to choose between the two records and decide which one to seal or expunge.

If you have numerous criminal cases which directly relate to the same original arrest, then the court may, at its sole discretion, order the expunction of your criminal history record pertaining to more than one arrest.

Which criminal records may be Expunged?

In order to expunge your criminal record you must have received one of the following results:

  • No Action – This means that after you were arrested, the Office of the State Attorney reviewed the circumstances of your arrest and decided not to file any charges against you.
  • Nolle Prosse (Dismissal) – This means that after you were arrested, the Office of the State Attorney did file formal charges against you but later decided to dismiss them.  This may be because of lack of evidence, problems with witnesses, participation in a pre-trial intervention program or many other possible reasons.
  • Acquittal by a Judge or Jury at trial – The means that you had a trial and were found not guilty of the charges brought against you by the Office of the State Attorney.

Which criminal records may be Sealed?

In order to seal your criminal record you must have received the following result:

  • Adjudication Withheld – This means that either your entered into a plea or went to trial and the court withheld the conviction against you.

Which criminal records may not be Sealed or Expunged?

You may not seal or expunge your criminal record if you have received the following result:

  • Adjudicated Guilty – This means that you were found guilty by the court after a plea or trial and that the court convicted you of the crime charged.

Charges that may never be Sealed:

  1. Arson;
  2. Aggravated Assault;
  3. Aggravated Battery;
  4. Illegal use of explosives;
  5. Child abuse or Aggravated Child Abuse;
  6. Abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult, or aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult;
  7. Aircraft piracy;
  8. Kidnapping;
  9. Homicide;
  10. Manslaughter;
  11. Sexual Battery;
  12. Robbery;
  13. Carjacking;
  14. Lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault or act upon or in the presence of a child under the age of 16 years;
  15. Sexual activity with a child, who is 12 years of age or older but less than 18 years of age, by or at solicitation of a person in familial or custodial authority;
  16. Burglary of a dwelling;
  17. Stalking and Aggravated Stalking;
  18. Act of Domestic Violence as defined in §741.28;
  19. Home-invasion Robbery;
  20. Act of Terrorism as defined by §773.30;
  21. Manufacturing any substances in violation of §893;
  22. Attempting or conspiring to commit any of the above crimes;
  23. Sexual misconduct with developmentally disabled person and related offenses;
  24. Sexual misconduct with mental health patient and related offenses;
  25. Luring or enticing a child;
  26. Sexual Battery and related offenses;
  27. Procuring person under 18 for prostitution;
  28. Lewd or lascivious offenses committed upon or in the presence of persons less than 16 years of age;
  29. Voyeurism;
  30. Florida Communication Fraud Act (Scheme to Defraud or Organized Fraud, as used in §817.034);
  31. Lewd or lascivious offense upon or in presence of elderly person or disabled person;
  32. Sexual performance by a child;
  33. Offenses By Public Officers and Employees;
  34. Showing, selling, etc., obscene literature to minor;
  35. Computer pornography;
  36. Selling or buying of minors;
  37. Trafficking in controlled substances;
  38. Sexual misconduct with mentally deficient or mentally ill defendant and related offenses
    A violation of any offense qualify for registration as a sexual predator under §775.21 or for registration as a sexual offender under §943.0435.

 If my criminal record is expunged, do I have to tell employers who ask if I have a record?

Once your criminal record is expunged, you may deny or fail to acknowledge your criminal record.  However, there are a few exceptions where a person must disclose an expunged record:

  • The person is a candidate for employment with a criminal justice agency;
  • The person is a defendant in a criminal prosecution;
  • The person is seeking to seal a record under §943.059;
  • The person is a candidate for admission to The Florida Bar;
  • The person is seeking to be employed or licensed by or to contract with the Department of Children and Family Services, the Agency for Health Care Administration, the Agency for Persons with Disabilities, or the Department of Juvenile Justice or to be employed or used by such contractor or licensee in a sensitive position having direct contact with children, the developmentally disabled, the aged, or the elderly as provided in §110.1127(3), §393.063, 394.4572.(1), §397.451, §402.302(3), §402.313(3), §409.175(2)(i), §415.102(5), chapter 916, §985.644, chapter 400 or chapter 429.
  • The person is seeking to be employed or licensed by the Department of Education, any district school board, any university laboratory school, any charter school, any private or parochial school, or any local governmental entity that licenses child care facilities; or
  • The person is seeking authorization from a seaport listed in §311.09 for employment within or access to one or more of such seaports pursuant to §311.12.

The process to Seal or Expunge a criminal record can take approximately 4 – 6 months.  Please contact our office if you have any questions or would like to Seal or Expunge a past criminal record.

Casey Anthony released from jail

As expected, Casey Anthony was released from the Orange County Jail early Sunday morning.  She walked out of the jail booking center at 12:10am with her attorney, Jose Baez and was whisked away in a dark colored SUV.  She was given $537.68 from her jail account upon her release.

Judge declares mistrial in Roger Clemens perjury and obstuction trial

On only the second day of testimony, Clemens’ perjury and obstruction trial has ended after Judge Reggie Walton was left with no other choice than to grant a mistrial.  The mistrial was prompted by the prosecution’s showing of a video that showed former teammate Andy Pettitte declaring that he had told his wife about Clemens’ drug use.  The testimony regarding Pettitte’s wife had been ruled as inadmissible hearsay in pretrial motions before the court.

After declaring a mistrial, the Judge stated, “Mr. Clemens has to get a fair trial… in my view, he can’t get it now.”  The Judge came down hard on the prosecutors and said that a “first-year law student” would have known better than to present such evidence.

A hearing has been scheduled September 2 to determine whether or not to have a new trial.  At that hearing, Judge Walton could possibly finish the prosecution’s case by declaring that a new trial would be double jeopardy.

Rubino Law visits Constitutional Court of South Africa in Johannesburg


Today, while on vacation, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to visit the Constitutional Court of South Africa which is located in Johannesburg .  The court is the highest court in South Africa regarding constitutional matters.  It would be the equivalent of the United States Supreme Court.  The actual courthouse was a beautiful, open and airy building.  The courthouse is open to the public 24 hours a day and 7 days a week.  The court also has a very impressive art collection which houses works from many famous South African artists.

The Creation of the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court of South Africa was established in 1994 by South Africa’s first democratic constitution which was called the Interim Constitution of 1993.  The court began its first sessions in February 1995.  The location of the court was moved in February 2004, to Constitution Hill in Johannesburg upon the completion of the current courthouse.  The Constitutional Court consists of 11 judges, headed by a Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice.  Currently eight of the judges are men and three are women.  The judge’s duty is to uphold the law and the constitution, which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice.

The constitution requires that a matter before the court be heard by at least eight judges. In practice, all eleven judges hear almost every case.  If any judge is absent for a long period or a vacancy arises, an acting judge may be appointed by the President of the Republic on a temporary basis on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice acting with the concurrence of the Chief Justice.  Decisions of the Court are reached by majority vote of the judges sitting in a case and each judge must indicate his or her decision.  The reasons for the decision are then published in a written judgment.

The Building (from the Constitutional Court website)

The Constitutional Court was designed to reflect the values of South Africa’s new constitutional democracy.  The building is noted for its transparency and entrancing volumes.  In contrast to most courts, it is welcoming rather than forbidding, filled with sparkle and warmth.  It has no marble cladding or wood paneling, but has come to be admired for its graceful proportions.  The principal materials – timber, concrete, steel, glass and black slate – infuse the court with an African feel.

The foyer of the Court is a spacious, light-filled area punctuated by slanting columns, an architectural metaphor for trees under which African villagers traditionally resolved their legal disputes. On the columns are mosaics – blue, green, orange and red. In keeping with this metaphor, the concrete roof has slots designed to create moving areas akin to dappled sunlight filtering through leaves.

The roof’s concrete beams are inscribed with the words ”human dignity, equality and freedom” in samples of the handwriting of each of the judges incumbent during the building of the court.

The foyer includes a curved wall containing 512 stained-glass windows. The timber door to the foyer, a 9m-high work of art, features plaques carved with words and sign-language symbols conveying the 27 rights enshrined in the Constitution.

The court chamber is more austere and has a low-lying ribbon of glass that emphasizes the transparency of its proceedings.

The building has two layers: the outer one consists of the foyer, the court chamber, an auditorium and an exhibition space that opens out on to the Great African Steps. The next layer consists of the administration section, the judges’ conference and meeting rooms, and, right in the middle of the building, 14 judges’ chambers – 11 for the Constitutional Court judges and three for visiting ones.

The judges’ chambers are on three stories and have open spaces and ponds at ground level. They offer easy access to the court and to the library, in the northern wing of the building.

The foyer opens on to Constitution Square – the precinct’s open-air hub. The court chamber itself and Constitution Square have been constructed on the site of the awaiting-trial block, which was built in 1928 and demolished to make way for the Court. The architects have commemorated this important building by keeping four of its central stairwells and by using its bricks in the walls of the chamber.

Running the length of Constitution Square, the “We the People” wall displays the opinions and impressions of visitors to Constitution Hill. Contributors to the wall include former president Nelson Mandela and other ex-prisoners.

The Great African Steps lead from Constitution Square to the ramparts of the Old Fort and Number Four Prison. The steps divide the old stone wall of Number Four and the Court’s glass frontage – a walkway between the past and the future.

The three main prison buildings of the Old Fort remain. The court itself is on the east side of the site; there are sports facilities below. In the northwest corner, the defunct Queen Victoria Hospital is already being used as residential space.

Further west, off Constitution Square, is space for a coffee shop, bookshops and a tourist office. Other organizations will find a home here too, such as those bodies established in terms of Chapter 9 of the Constitution to foster our constitutional democracy.

The Court’s permanent home was inaugurated by President Thabo Mbeki on Human Rights Day in 2004 – part of the celebration of 10 years of democracy.

At the inauguration, President Mbeki stated, “The formation of this new and magnificent structure also gave us the opportunity to encourage and celebrate the creative talent of our people. It provided the time and space for the architects, workers in the plastic arts and landscape gardeners to give free rein to their imagination. And thus it has made the statement that all human beings have a soul, and are miraculous creations that are more than mere law-governed animals.”

Boyfriend and Mother on trial because their pet python strangled their 2 year old child

Reuters

ORLANDO, Fla – Trial proceedings began on Monday for a central Florida mother and her boyfriend who are accused of allowing their pet python to strangle a 2-year-old girl in her crib.

Jaren Hare, 21, and boyfriend Charles Darnell, 34, were charged with manslaughter, third-degree murder and child neglect after the July 1, 2009, death of Hare’s daughter, Shaianna Hare, in Bushnell northwest of Orlando.

Darnell found the couple’s 12-foot-long albino Burmese python named Gypsy wrapped around Shaianna’s head and body, according to the Sumter County Sheriff’s Office. The medical examiner found bite marks on the child’s head and arms.

Darnell estimated that Shaianna weighed 22 pounds compared to the snake’s 45 to 50 pounds, the incident report said.

Darnell told deputies that he woke up in the middle of the night, found the python in the hallway and returned it to its 200-gallon aquarium where it spent most of its time. He thought he had secured the snake by placing it in a laundry bag, which had a small hole in it, and then covering the aquarium with a quilt held on by safety pins.

But Hare told deputies that the snake had escaped from the tank and laundry bag 10 times in the previous two months, and she was planning to make a locking lid for the tank.

Florida state law requires owners to keep pythons under lock and key. Neither Darnell nor Hare obtained a state permit to keep the python.

Darnell said the snake was due for its monthly feeding, but he didn’t think the animal wanted to eat the little girl. Darnell said he stabbed the snake while trying to pry the toddler from its grip but the child was already dead, the sheriff’s report stated.

The couple told deputies they often took the snake out of the tank to play with it and would place it around the shoulders of the children in the home without incident.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission took possession of the python and a red-tailed boa constrictor in the home. After the python was treated for stab wounds, both reptiles were placed with a licensed facility.

Lawyers selected a jury on Monday and were scheduled to begin opening statements Tuesday morning.

Update:  Thursday, July 14th – Jaren Hare, 21, and her boyfriend, Charles Darnell, 34, were found guilty of third-degree murder, manslaughter and child neglect in the 2009 death of Hare’s 2-year-old daughter Shaiunna.

Casey Anthony Sentenced

Casey Anthony was sentenced this morning to 4 years in the county jail for her conviction on four counts of Providing False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer. The Judge, Belvin Perry, gave her the maximum possible time in jail allowed under the law by handing down the 4 one-year terms in jail to be served consecutively. She will also receive over 3 years of credit for time served as well as gain time from the jail for good behavior. Some early estimates indicate that she could be released later this month or sometime in early August.

Update: Casey Anthony will be released on Sunday, July 17th due to credit for time already served and gain time for good behavior. It will be her 1,007th day in jail.